Sync RAG and semantic-search updates from che-computing

- 03-rag, 04-semantic-search: env-var-before-imports fix in build/query scripts
- 03-rag: new libraries section, fetch_arxiv.py, exercises for larger corpus
  and finding current SOTA models, formal references (Lewis, Booth)
- 04-semantic-search: libraries pointer back to Part III, larger corpus
  subsection, model-update exercise, formal references
- 06-neural-networks: add Nielsen reference (recommended by student)
- README: vocab.md link, agentic systems in description, Ollama prereq for 02-05
- New: vocab.md (glossary organized by section)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Furst 2026-04-28 12:05:08 -04:00
commit 59e5f86884
9 changed files with 359 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -100,9 +100,46 @@ Save this as `cache_model.py` and run it:
```bash
python cache_model.py
```
(This is also saved in the Github.) Each script that uses the model will set environmental variables to prevent checking for updates. You can manually update either by running `cache_model.py` or editing the scripts themselves.
## 2. The libraries we use
A RAG system is built from three independent layers, each handled by a different library:
| Layer | Library | What it does |
|-------|---------|--------------|
| **Orchestration** | [LlamaIndex](https://docs.llamaindex.ai/) | Glues the pieces together: chunking, indexing, retrieval, prompt assembly, response synthesis |
| **Embeddings** | [Hugging Face](https://huggingface.co/) (via `sentence-transformers`) | Provides the model that converts text into vectors |
| **Generation** | [Ollama](https://ollama.com/) | Runs the LLM that produces the final answer |
LlamaIndex used to be a single package; since version 0.10 it has been split into a small `llama-index-core` plus dedicated integration packages. That is why our `pip install` line includes several `llama-index-*` packages -- one for each external thing we plug in (Ollama for the LLM, Hugging Face for embeddings, file readers for local documents). If you find older tutorials online that import from `llama_index` (no `.core`), they predate the split and will not work.
The two key patterns to recognize in `build.py` and `query.py`:
**1. Global `Settings`.** Instead of passing the LLM and embedding model into every call, LlamaIndex uses a global `Settings` object:
```python
Settings.llm = Ollama(model="command-r7b", request_timeout=360.0)
Settings.embed_model = HuggingFaceEmbedding(model_name="BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5")
```
After these two lines, every component (index, query engine, retriever) automatically uses the configured models. This replaced the older `ServiceContext` pattern, which has been removed.
**2. Environment variables before imports.** At the top of each script:
```python
import os
os.environ["TOKENIZERS_PARALLELISM"] = "false"
os.environ["SENTENCE_TRANSFORMERS_HOME"] = "./models"
os.environ["HF_HUB_OFFLINE"] = "1"
```
These must come *before* `from llama_index...` imports, because the Hugging Face libraries read the environment at import time. `HF_HUB_OFFLINE=1` tells the libraries not to check the Hub for updates on every run -- without it, you will see a "sending unauthenticated requests to the HF Hub" warning and the script may slow down or stall on a poor connection. `SENTENCE_TRANSFORMERS_HOME` controls where embedding models are cached.
If you ever swap to a different embedding model and need a fresh download, temporarily remove `HF_HUB_OFFLINE` for one run or use a standalone script like `cache_model.py`.
## 2. The documents
## 3. The documents
The `data/` directory contains 10 emails from the University of Delaware president's office, spanning 20122025 (the same set from Part II). Each is a plain text file with a subject line, date, and body text.
@ -124,7 +161,7 @@ python clean_eml.py
This extracts the subject, date, and body from each email and writes a dated `.txt` file to `./data`.
## 3. Building the vector store
## 4. Building the vector store
The script `build.py` does the heavy lifting:
@ -154,7 +191,7 @@ We can't embed an entire document as a single vector — it would lose too much
> **Exercise 1:** Look at `build.py`. What would happen if you made the chunks much smaller (e.g., 100 tokens)? Much larger (e.g., 2000 tokens)? Think about the tradeoff between precision and context.
## 4. Querying the vector store
## 5. Querying the vector store
The script `query.py` loads the stored index, takes your question, and returns a response grounded in the documents:
@ -207,7 +244,7 @@ Notice the **similarity scores** — these are cosine similarities between the q
> **Exercise 2:** Run the same query twice. Do you get exactly the same output? Why or why not?
## 5. Understanding the pieces
## 6. Understanding the pieces
### The embedding model
@ -236,7 +273,7 @@ Our custom prompt in `query.py` is more detailed — it asks for structured outp
> **Exercise 3:** Modify the prompt in `query.py`. For example, ask the model to respond in the style of a news reporter, or to focus only on dates and events. How does the output change?
## 6. Exercises
## 7. Exercises
> **Exercise 4:** Try different embedding models. Replace `BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5` with `sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2` in both `build.py` and `query.py`. Rebuild the vector store and compare the results.
@ -246,6 +283,30 @@ Our custom prompt in `query.py` is more detailed — it asks for structured outp
> **Exercise 7:** Bring your own documents. Find a collection of text files — research paper abstracts, class notes, or a downloaded text from Project Gutenberg — and build a RAG system over them. What questions can you answer that a plain LLM cannot?
> **Exercise 8 (optional, sets up Part IV):** Build a larger corpus. Ten emails is small enough that retrieval is barely selective — the system returns most of the corpus on every query. The script `fetch_arxiv.py` pulls 100 recent abstracts from a chosen arXiv category and writes one text file per abstract:
>
> ```bash
> python fetch_arxiv.py --category cs.LG --max 100 --output data_arxiv
> ```
>
> Try other categories: `physics.chem-ph` (chemical physics), `cond-mat.soft` (soft matter), `cs.AI` (artificial intelligence), `cs.CL` (computational linguistics), `physics.flu-dyn` (fluid dynamics). Then update `build.py` to point at your new directory (or symlink it as `./data`), rebuild the vector store, and query it. With a 100-document corpus, retrieval becomes meaningfully selective and the choice of embedding model matters more.
>
> Other corpora to consider:
> - **CCPS process safety case studies** — https://www.aiche.org/ccps/resources (some are openly available as text or PDF)
> - **US Chemical Safety Board incident reports** — https://www.csb.gov/investigations/
> - **NIST chemistry data sheets** — https://webbook.nist.gov/
> - **AIChE journal abstracts** — many publishers expose abstracts via their APIs
>
> If your sources are PDFs, install `llama-index-readers-file` (already in `requirements.txt`) and use `SimpleDirectoryReader` — it picks up `.pdf` automatically.
> **Exercise 9 (optional):** The embedding model `BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5` and the LLM `command-r7b` were both released in 2024. By the time you read this, newer and likely better models exist. Find a current state-of-the-art:
>
> - Browse the [MTEB leaderboard](https://huggingface.co/spaces/mteb/leaderboard) for current top embedding models
> - Browse [Ollama's model library](https://ollama.com/library) sorted by recent or popular for current LLMs
> - Replace one model at a time in `build.py` and `query.py`, rebuild if the embedding model changes, and compare retrieval quality
>
> Document the model versions and dates in your machine log. Models that "feel old" are part of the engineering reality of working with this stack — what was best last year may not be best today.
## Additional resources and references
@ -270,5 +331,6 @@ Other embedding model mentioned: `sentence-transformers/all-mpnet-base-v2`
### Further reading
- NIST IR 8579, [*Developing the NCCoE Chatbot: Technical and Security Learnings from the Initial Implementation*](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/ir/8579/ipd) ([PDF](https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2025/NIST.IR.8579.ipd.pdf)) — practical guidance on building a RAG-based chatbot, including architecture and security considerations
- Open WebUI (https://openwebui.com) — a turnkey local RAG interface if you want a GUI
- Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks. In *Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems*, 2020. Curran Associates, Inc., 94599474. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/hash/6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Abstract.html — the foundational RAG paper that introduced the retrieve-and-generate framework we use here.
- Harold Booth. 2025. *Development and Implementation of the NCCoE Chatbot: A Comprehensive Report*. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8579.ipd — practical guidance on building a RAG-based chatbot, including architecture and security considerations.
- Open WebUI (https://openwebui.com) — a turnkey local RAG interface if you want a GUI.